Kenneth Whistler wrote,
> > > Another problem with TR28 is that its date is earlier than the date > > on TR27. This suggests that TR27 is more current. > > I don't understand this claim. > After misreading the dates and writing the letter last Monday, the internet connection was lost here for four days! I stand corrected (or, at least, better informed) on several items and am thankful to those who contributed to this thread. Best regards, James Kass.
