All your other good points noted: At 02:57 PM 7/1/02 -0600, John H. Jenkins wrote: >>Therefore, I would be much happier if the discussion of the 'standard' >>case wasn't as anglo-centric and allowed more directly for the fact that >>while fonts are in control of what ligatures are provided, layout engines >>may be in control of what and how many optional ligatures to use, the >>text (!) must be in control of where ligatures are mandatory or prohibited. > >Which is what Unicode 3.2 says. (You said it very nicely here, though.) > >(The standard case, BTW, seems to be Anglo-centric largely because this is >an English-speaking list and people always seem to start out with the "ct" > ligature they'd like to put in words like "respectfully." Sorry about > that.)
I guess I'm just trying to hold the list up to a higher standard. A./
