William Overington wrote: > >The problem (if there is one!) is only for font technology. > > > >> Ethiopian writing: [...] "The capability to the same electronically > >> would be well received. /Daniel." > > > >Same for this one: Unicode's task was to provide a code point for the > >Ethiopic full stop, and they did. Whether the corresponding glyph is > colored > >or not is problem for fonts and word processors. > > Well, may I please suggest that the issue is one for Unicode > as well as for font technology? > > [...]
Of course you can. But my feeling is that you already *did* suggest this, many and many times. I interpret your post as one more lengthy repetition of your well-known opinion: differences between "plain text" and "rich text" should not exist: they should be eliminated by incorporating the mark-up in the encoding. I think that it is your right to repeat your opinions as many times as you want. Nevertheless, I find that repeating opinions which are already well-known to everybody is *useless* and *boring*. _ Marco
