James E. Agenbroad scripsit: > The standards I cited use both > techniques (precomposed and decomposed letter+diacritic) but they don't > allow two ways of creating a single letter+diacritic combination the way > ISO10646/Unicode do.
Even Unicode doesn't go so far as to decompose WITH STROKE. In fact, I would argue that the COMBINING HORN was a mistake. It would have been only slightly less efficient to include O WITH HORN and U WITH HORN (uc and lc) as undecomposable letters; HORN is really not a diacritic but a modification of the ordinary O and U. -- John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.reutershealth.com http://www.ccil.org/~cowan Yakka foob mog. Grug pubbawup zink wattoom gazork. Chumble spuzz. -- Calvin, giving Newton's First Law "in his own words"
