John Hudson <tiro at tiro dot com> wrote: > Well, this is one of the areas in which there is a difference of > opinion. One school of thought says 'ZWJ means ligate this sequence, > if possible, in all cirucmstances because that is what the author of > the document has specified'. The other school of thought says 'ZWJ > means ligate this sequence, if possible, but then treat the ligature > like any other and feel free to break it if other layout > circumstances, e.g. letterspacing, would typically break a ligature'.
Hmm. That is a very interesting point. I hadn't thought of that. -Doug Ewell Fullerton, California
