On 07/22/2002 10:15:37 AM Marion Gunn wrote:
>I do know >what my company understood itself to be investing in through many >expensive years of supporting Unicode. It was in the Universal Character >Set and 10646 Implemenations, which I still hope to see Unicode produce, >or at least a reasonable timetable offered. Does Unicode have a >reasonable timetable to offer? I'm not sure I get this: 10646 implementations to be produced by [The] Unicode [Consortium]? My understanding is that TUC does not produce implementations; they only produce a standard known as The Unicode Standard. As for producing the Universal Character Set, they are in the process of doing that in concert with WG2, and are working with exactly the same timetable as WG2. The point of this thread escapes me. - Peter --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peter Constable Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International 7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA Tel: +1 972 708 7485 E-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
