-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Doug Ewell wrote: > Addison Phillips [wM] <aphillips at webmethods dot com> wrote: > > Well, I'm pretty sure Hawaiian isn't going to get [a 2-letter code], > > because it doesn't meet the requirements for ISO 639-1. > > The requirement that it doesn't meet is that it already has a 3-letter > code (haw). BTW, note that RFC 3066, in citing Hawaiian as an example > of this requirement, misstates the code for Hawaiian as "hwi".
I've submitted this as an erratum to the RFC editor (see <http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.html>). - -- David Hopwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home page & PGP public key: http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hopwood/ RSA 2048-bit; fingerprint 71 8E A6 23 0E D3 4C E5 0F 69 8C D4 FA 66 15 01 Nothing in this message is intended to be legally binding. If I revoke a public key but refuse to specify why, it is because the private key has been seized under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act; see www.fipr.org/rip -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3i Charset: noconv iQEVAwUBPUb13jkCAxeYt5gVAQFwpggAyY8ockLpXv0+x1MAa7TtdEC57HyyvS7S 4Kmg4zVKm6KgKBO+cxl5Q2uh2jQYjomtX8ip7DfilEoUeMhRyhw4luMrhrOvQ9cT 57OkCoJXwTE78K9qEQRNGHaPT+Ue6Bou+rb6Xu47N2b1wQ8eGX4x8KmylF4eNwAD yNee2w0M0Tb8+w1nMVVmwrZ6IKYYr+Am7Gh1MaWmitCGKPi0Erj8WA/rfKvpM0LJ zUyUjrBddHz02FwKBxiDbZwXIwhG2MqP83jQ4snfXwjxBjVl0+lscAZmhqmE/rLu CtiMJv8ol8wAgLlr94RzrWdaHkzJc0RiwyhHbegnW4O6zt6DR3RW8A== =iJT9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
