"John H. Jenkins" wrote: > > Of course, using the taboo variant selector is about as vague as an > IDC, so it doesn't make that much difference. >
Actually, on second thoughts, why do we need a taboo variant selector when we already have generic variation selectors (U+FE00 through U+FE0F) ? The Standardized Variants document <http://www.unicode.org/Public/UNIDATA/StandardizedVariants.html> states : <quote> Han Variants At this time no Han variants exist. When they do, a table will be inserted here. </quote> Surely if there ever was a place to put taboo-form variants, this is it. Andrew C. West <http://uk.geocities.com/babelstone1357/>
