Kenneth Whistler wrote,
> Please note that both the UTC and WG2 have approved a new set > of combining double accents: > > U+035D COMBINING DOUBLE BREVE > U+035E COMBINING DOUBLE MACRON > U+035F COMBINING DOUBLE LOW LINE > > <snip> > > Now, the question is, how long will it take for the fonts and > browsers to catch up on those forms, as well?? > The other double combiner marks already work fairly well in default position in existing browsers. These ought to work right out-of-the- box, once fonts include glyphs. Is it safe to include glyphs for the above referenced characters now? Best regards, James Kass.
