At 10:33 +0100 2002-08-31, William Overington wrote: >An interesting problem which may arise is that the Unicode Consortium will >not be specifying particular ligatures to include in fonts
That isn't its job. You're right that guidance to what precomposed glyphs are useful is necessary. But it differs for different people. I would think that all font makers ought to include i-ogonek-acute (used in Navajo) but one would not expect the baroque panoply of Uralic Phonetic Alphabet combinations to be generally supported by generic fonts. -- Michael Everson *** Everson Typography *** http://www.evertype.com
