I wrote:
> Peter Constable wrote:
> > On 09/09/2002 02:43:52 AM Marco Cimarosti wrote:
> >
> > >1. List "Vowels" - probably not vowels:
> >
> > >U+212B # (�) ANGSTROM SIGN
> >
> > Given that this is canonically equivalent with a-ring, does
> > it make sense to consider one a vowel but the other not?
>
> I stand corrected.
>
> Somehow, I convinced myself that � had canonical compatibility.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Of course, what I wrongly convinced myself it had was: "compatibility
decomposition".
I shall be silent for a while, I guess.
_ Marco
