On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, "John H. Jenkins" wrote: > I think it's a variant turtle ideograph. :-)
Turtle ?! It has a passing resemblance to the Hangul Jamo U+110C (HANGUL CHOSEONG CIEUC), but could not possibly be mistaken for a CJK ideograph ... certainly not any variant of turtle (U+9F9C, U+9F9F, U+4E80 etc.). Andrew
