On 10/24/2002 01:02:39 PM "Kent Karlsson" wrote: >> then *any* font having a unicode cmap is a Unicode font. > >No, not if the glyps (for the "supported characters") are >inappropriate for the characters given.
Kent is quite right here. There are a *lot* of fonts out there with Unicode cmaps that do not at all conform to the Unicode standard --- custom-encoded (some call them "hacked") fonts, usually abusing the characters that make up Windows cp1252. - Peter --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peter Constable Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International 7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA Tel: +1 972 708 7485 E-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
