>At 21:07 +0100 2002-10-29, Marco Cimarosti wrote: > >> > I'm sure Michael would agree too (at least I hope so), and many others. >> >>There are many Michaels and many "others" here... If any of them wish to >>intervene, I hope they'll rather say something new to take the discussion >>out of the loop, rather than joining one faction. > >My eyes have glazed over reading this discussion. What am I being >asked to agree with?
Is it complaint with Unicode to have a font where a-umlaut has a glyph of a with e above? What about a glyph of a-macron (e.g. a handwriting font for someone who writes a-umlaut that way)?
