[EMAIL PROTECTED] scripsit: > Small Hebrew (Neo-Aramaic, Judeo-Tat, etc.) > proposal ready for comments at given URL. > > Not finished, first viewing--Elaine
First cut: HEBREW ACCENT COMBINING VERTICAL LINE: probably OK HEBREW ACCENT ZINNORIT: probably OK HEBREW ACCENT MAYELA: probably OK (names can't have "'" in them) HEBREW MARK LOWER DOT: not needed, use generic U+0323 COMBINING DOT BELOW HEBREW MARK COMMON KETIV QERE: probably OK, can't use /, why SYMBOL? HEBREW MARK CAIRO KETIV QERE: name problematic, only a font difference from above? HEBREW LETTER REVERSED NUN: probably OK HEBREW VERSE ENDING MARK: should not be encoded, use higher-level protocol HEBREW COLUMN ENDING MARK: should not be encoded, use higher-level protocol left-displaced acute, lacks a name: probably OK diaeresis, lacks a name: not needed, use generic U+0308 COMBINING DIAERESIS HEBREW LIGATURE ALEPH YOD: should not be encoded, no new ligatures HEBREW LIGATURE ALEPH YOD YOD: ditto HEBREW LIGATURE LAMED YOD: ditto HEBREW LIGATURE NUN YOD: ditto HEBREW LIGATURE ALEPH VAV: ditto HEBREW LIGATURE VAV ALEPH: ditto HEBREW LIGATURE VAV VAV YOD: ditto HEBREW LIGATURE GIMEL YOD: ditto That leaves 6 possibles. -- With techies, I've generally found John Cowan If your arguments lose the first round http://www.reutershealth.com Make it rhyme, make it scan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan Then you generally can [EMAIL PROTECTED] Make the same stupid point seem profound! --Jonathan Robie
