From: "Joseph Boyle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > These are listed as examples to demonstrate the idea of a configuration file > listing encoding constraints. The fact that each constraint is arguable is a > good reason to make the constraints configurable, and therefore to have > names to distinguish BOM and non-BOM UTF-8.
Yes, but the fact that every one of them can have it or not and only inadequate parsers will ever really have a problem with them is a good indication that it is not really required for the users who care about separate charset names.... MichKa
