Dean Snyder scripsit: > Group A writes the logically ordered graphemic sequence *acme* as "acme"; > group B as "emca".
This fact requires separate encoding, because bidi-ness is a noncontextual property of a Unicode character. > Group A pronounces the graphemic sequence "acme" as /acme/; group B as /stoi/. This is irrelevant. > Group A uppercases the graphemic sequence "acme" as "ACME"; group B as > "acme" (i.e., no uppercase). This is handled with language-specific casing. > Group A ligates the sequence "acme" as "a" + "cme"; group B as "ac" + "me". This isn't even a Unicode issue, it's a font issue. -- Her he asked if O'Hare Doctor tidings sent from far John Cowan coast and she with grameful sigh him answered that www.ccil.org/~cowan O'Hare Doctor in heaven was. Sad was the man that word www.reutershealth.com to hear that him so heavied in bowels ruthful. All [EMAIL PROTECTED] she there told him, ruing death for friend so young, algate sore unwilling God's rightwiseness to withsay. _Ulysses_, "Oxen"
