As this will likely come up in my line of work (tech support and troubleshooting for products which, among other things, export HTML), I would be interested in any more detail/explanation (or pointers to such) about "using Uniscribe for complex text rendering" and/or why using Arial Unicode MS would cause such a problem, or why using a different font would solve the problem.
I think I'm "hearing" that some combination and/or reordering of glyphs is needed for Hindi, and just having the right characters alone isn't enough... is that on the right track? Best regards, Gary At 02:00 AM 11/21/2002 , "Joseph Boyle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >The page already has the "corrected" appearance when I view it on IE6 / XP, but the >incorrect appearance on IE5.5 / NT4. I am guessing that his Windows is not using >Uniscribe for complex text rendering, either because it is an older version like NT4, >or because complex script support or langauge packs using it are not checked in >Regional Settings. At 05:41 PM 11/20/2002 , Andy White wrote: > > The Unicode office has received this email claiming that our > > page "What is Unicode in Hindi" is incorrect. Can anyone verify this. > >The Page is correct > >Anirudh Pandya wrote: > >>... I am > > > using IE 6 with SP1 installed. I am attaching (an HTML file) > > > the corrected > > > spelling of the transliteration of 'Unicode' on the hindi site. > >I think that the problem is that you are viewing the page with the >ArialUnicode font. To check, in IE select >Tools/InternetOptions/GeneralTab/Fonts/Devanagari and see what is >selected. >You should be able to view Unicode text in web pages correctly on >Windows 98 (and I think Win 95) or later, if you also have with IE 5 (or >later), provided that an appropriate Open Type font is also installed. >For an example OT font you could try installing Raghu available here: >http://www.nepali.info/nepali/help.asp > >Regards >Andy > --- Gary Grosso [EMAIL PROTECTED] Arbortext, Inc. Ann Arbor, MI, USA
