On Mon, 16 Dec 2002 09:30:10 -0800 (PST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I think that it is intended to use the eqivalent Tibetian character sequences to > produce the various types of Biruga, rather than MFVSs.
Sound eminently sensible and Unicode-like to use Tibetan symbols for Mongolian where appropriate. Is the following what you're suggesting ? 1st variant form = U+0F04 3rd variant form = U+0F04, U+0F05 4th variant form = U+0F04, U+0F05, U+0F05 > This does raise an issue > over the rotated varient but that perhaps could become the standard glyph for > the character in the Mongolian block. Is it possible to change the standard glyph for a character once it has been carved in stone on the Unicode code charts ? And if it were possible, then how would the horizontal form be represented ? There is no exactly corresponding form in the Tibetan block. Andrew
