Andy White scripsit: > Seriously, please see and comment on: "A request to make the Unicode Standard > compatible with the ISCII Standard", here: >http://www.exnet.btinternet.co.uk/uniprop/encoding.htm
It is impossible to make out from this what Unicode currently does vs. what you want it to do. It would be more effective for you to write sentences like "Unicode currently renders foo-bar-baz as squiggle-squiggle, but that should be quoggle-quoggle." -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Any legal document draws most of its meaning from context. A telegram that says 'SELL HUNDRED THOUSAND SHARES IBM SHORT' (only 190 bits in 5-bit Baudot code plus appropriate headers) is as good a legal document as any, even sans digital signature." --me
