This new AGL simply looks like an error to me. It contains all Adobe's
in-house production names in addition to the names used for final font
files. I believe it is possible that someone at Adobe compiled the wrong list.
I am not aware of anything in Adobe software that favours AGL names above
uniXXXX names. It is perfectly safe to ignore the AGL completely, even for
basic Latin characters if you so choose.
John Hudson
Tiro Typeworks www.tiro.com
Vancouver, BC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A book is a visitor whose visits may be rare,
or frequent, or so continual that it haunts you
like your shadow and becomes a part of you.
- al-Jahiz, The Book of Animals
- Oh No! Not a new Adobe Glyph List!!! Kevin Brown
- Re: Oh No! Not a new Adobe Glyph List!!! John Hudson
- Re: Oh No! Not a new Adobe Glyph List!!! Peter Lofting
- Re: Oh No! Not a new Adobe Glyph List!!! John Hudson
- Re: Oh No! Not a new Adobe Glyph List!!! Eric Muller
- Re: Oh No! Not a new Adobe Glyph List!!! Peter_Constable
- Re: Oh No! Not a new Adobe Glyph List!!! Kevin Brown
- Re: Oh No! Not a new Adobe Glyph List!!! John Hudson
- Re: Oh No! Not a new Adobe Glyph List!!! Rick McGowan
- Re: Oh No! Not a new Adobe Glyph List!!! Eric Muller
- Re: Oh No! Not a new Adobe Glyph List!!! Asmus Freytag
- Re: Oh No! Not a new Adobe Glyph List!!! Kevin Brown

