Paul Hastings <paul at tei dot or dot th> wrote: > besides ms arial would anybody like to recommend a font suitable for > vietnamese?
<assume platform="Windows"> Plain old Arial actually isn't your best choice, because it displays the circumflex-plus-grave and circumflex-plus-acute combinations incorrectly. For Vietnamese they're supposed to be side-by-side, not one stacked on top of the other. Courier New and Times New Roman have the same problem. Fonts on my Windows 2000 system (at work) that support the Vietnamese precomposed characters *and* display these combinations correctly include: - Arial Unicode MS - Code2000 - Gentium and GentiumAlt - Microsoft Sans Serif (not "MS Sans Serif") - Palatino Linotype (not "Palatino") - Tahoma - TITUS Cyberbit Basic - Verdana - Verdana Ref Palatino Linotype is interesting: it displays the grave tone mark to the right of the circumflex (^`), unlike the others (`^), but according to some Vietnamese the first method is preferable. On Verdana Ref, the vertical spacing is a bit too tight for comfort for stacked combinations like circumflex-plus-tilde, but you may be able to adjust this. For best typography, you want to make sure your font supports the Vietnamese precomposed characters in the U+1Exx range. The decomposed combinations are canonically equivalent, of course, but they may not display as nicely on currently available rendering engines. Don't settle for a font that only supports the "Windows Vietnamese" (CP1258) set. And do *not* let yourself get involved with VNI fonts. </assume> -Doug Ewell Fullerton, California
