Kenneth Whistler also wrote:
Andy wrote: > > And the well-defined way [to encode A+zophola+AA] is? > > Described in the FAQ, and to be described in the text > of Unicode 4.0. I'm in shock. What gave you the power to suddenly come up with encoding innovations such as this? The FAQ has continually been queried and criticised since it was put up, but you are seriously going to stand by it aren't you. Have you discussed this with anyone involved in coding Indic such as MS or the Gov of India? Did you not consider more sensible coding such as using CGJ or ZWJ characters? Just who was this dreadful decision agreed with? Andy
