Andy White wrote:
> > The Unicode Standard disagrees. TUS3.0, Chapter 9, page 214,
> > Figure 9-3 ("Conjunct Formations"), example (4) [...]
>
> In the light of Jim Agenbroads information and references, I
> think this sentence is wrong.
Yes, in *that* light it is, of course... :-)
Just I think that the manual of an encoding standard is a better reference
for understanding that encoding standard than a dictionary of a dead
language.
> I'm sorry Marco, but you have got your rows and coulombs muddled!
> [...]
> I think you are looking at the third row which depicts
> 'RA+UU' (U+0930 U+0942)
> [...]
> The fourth row up shows the combination of Ha + Vocali R
> (U+0939 U+0943)
Oooops!
I stand corrected. I have mixed up two different rows.
_ Marco
