> Thanks. As a conclusion it seems that both Adobe's mapping of
> U+03D5 and U+03C6 to glyph names and the Unicode annotation for
> U+03D5 is incorrect (in case backwards compatibility is of
> importance).
>
> The right mapping should be
>
> phi 03D5
> phi1 03C6
I have to correct myself, fortunately. After looking into the printed
version of Unicode 2.0 I see that the glyphs of 03D5 and 03C6 in the
file U0370.pdf are exchanged. Your assuption is correct that the
annotation in Unicode 3.2 is wrong.
Werner
