[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > 1. the definitation in Unicode itself (3.0, 3.1) > 2. the RFC which summarize it. > > I am sure you can control the point 1. But we have to understand the > point 2 is also important. The reasone people refer to point 2 is > usually the RFC is much shorter and focus than the Unicode standard > itself. And also RFC is FREE of charge but not Unicode > standard itself.
Consequently, it would be nice if anyone with an interest in the matter would carefully review the internet-draft that is meant to replace RFC 2279 very soon: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-04.txt The proper list for discussing this draft is [EMAIL PROTECTED], see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ for archives and subscription info. -- Fran�ois
