Guess I am not the right peson to answer that. put it back to unicode.org mailling list.
Let me ask you this way. Is this a rendering style issue? or is it a different way to combine characers?
How you pronounce the following 3?
Is there different pronouncation between 1 and 3?
Is there different pronouncation between 2 and 3?
The answer of the two questions above may tell us it is a encoding issue or a presentation (glyph variant) issue.
> This is a unique spelling that is commonly found in the Quran.
Is that spelling also found in text OTHER than the Quran?
Mete Kural wrote:
Hello Yung-Fong,
Thank you very much for all the information. It was very helpful. I'm still not clear about something though. As far as I understand, the block of characters U+0644-U+0654-U+0627 would be rendered as such:
c \ /
\/
/\
\/
U+0644-U+0627-U+0654 would be rendered:
c \ /
\/
/\
\/
So how would you encode this rendering?
c \ /
\/
/\
\/
in which the hamza is neither directly above the alef, nor directly above the lam, but it's in between the alef and lam. This is a unique spelling that is commonly found in the Quran.
Thank you very much for the help.
Mete
--- Yung-Fong Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
