Quoting Marco Cimarosti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Mijan wrote: > > [...] > > > >3. There are no other cases of a Vowel+Virama combination in the > > > >Unicode encoding model. > > > > > > Yes, there are. Khmer. > > > > I do not understand Khmer but I see that it does not use the > > same 'encoding model'. Please look, you will see that you > > were wrong to use Khmer as an example. > > What do you mean by not using the same "encoding model"? > > There are actually three Indic scripts that have been encoded with a > different model: Tibetan (subscript letters are encoded separately, rather > than as combinations of virama + consonant), and Thai/Lao (reordrant vowel > marks are encoded in visual order, rather than in phonetic order). > > But, AFAIK, this is not the case of Unicode Khmer, which is encoded in the > same way as the scripts of India.
Thank you for the correction. I said I do not understand Khmer. I was understanding that scripts not based on ISCII were using different "encoding model" Mijan ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through http://www.bangladesh.net
