> It has been suggested many times to build a database (list, > document, XML, ...) where each > designated/assigned code point and each character gets its > "story": Comments on the glyphs, from > what codepage it was inherited, usage comments and examples, > alternate names, etc. > > I am talking about both code points and "characters" on > purpose, and I would go a step beyond > documenting what's there. All the "characters" that can be > represented by a sequence of assigned > Unicode characters should be listed, with that sequence (or > those sequences), and with further > explanation if necessary.
But doesn't we have such - at least for newer additions? Because, the proposals to add new characters offer almost large background (only to increase the chance to realy become the character added?!? :-). Where do all this wonderful information goes after adding? Best regards. -- Dominikus Scherkl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
