At 08:08 AM 3/14/2003, William Overington wrote:

I find it strange that the
Unicode Standard does not codify the ligatures which can be produced with
the languages of the Indian subcontinent at display time using specific
sequences of regular Unicode characters so that someone skilled in the art
of font design may design a font from the code charts.

Someone skilled in the art of font design doesn't need to see all possible ligatures reproduced in a code chart. Trust me, anyone designing typefaces for Indic scripts understands the difference between a character and a glyph.


John Hudson

Tiro Typeworks          www.tiro.com
Vancouver, BC           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

It is necessary that by all means and cunning,
the cursed owners of books should be persuaded
to make them available to us, either by argument
or by force.      - Michael Apostolis, 1467




Reply via email to