At 02:25 AM 3/18/2003, Pim Blokland wrote:

On the other hand, it has been done! There are occasions on which
new codepoints were created for characters that were basically glyph
variants. The greek letter koppa springs to mind: there are two
glyph variants for this letter, and when it turned out font
designers weren't sure how it should look, new codepoints were
introduced for the "archaic" koppa, in order to show both variants
and avoid confusion.

The two 'glyph variants' of the archaic koppa have very different semantic values: one is used as a letter and one is used in a numeric context. I think this supports the view that they should, in fact, be considered as separate characters, since both forms may be used in a document and it may be necessary, even in plain text, to distinguish them.


John Hudson

Tiro Typeworks          www.tiro.com
Vancouver, BC           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Anyone who has both children and house pets has
surely noticed that the children exposed to language
will develop language, in turn, whereas the house
pets will not.       - Stephen Pinker




Reply via email to