Kenneth Whistler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 04/04/2003 05:09:25 PM:
> > There is another convention, admittedly far less widespread: cedilla. > I don't think this is an accepted convention. No, not very widespread. > I think those instances where you find a > linguist publishing using vowels with cedilla for *nasalization* > are results of either: a. confusion by the user regarding the > direction of the hooks, or b. symbol substitution when using a > font that had the cedilla forms but not the ogoneks. Entirely possible. I have certainly seen cases of obvious symbol substitution for various things. > Using U+0328. OK. > Note that the example you posted also had an h-ogonek, so the > usage is not limited to vowels, per se. Indeed. > (Although that particular > entity itself is a little bizarre, since you cannot really > nasalize a voiceless glottal fricative. Then you'd be even more surprised at c-ogonek. (IJAL 65, p. 331.) - Peter --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peter Constable Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International 7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA Tel: +1 972 708 7485
