William Overington wrote on 05/30/2003 03:20:51 AM: > 1. I tried out the validation procedure on the following page. > > http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~ngo/font7007.htm > > This is a not too lengthy web page with just Basic Latin letters. It will > not validate. It is not clear to me what I need to add to the page to get > it to validate. Could there be some very short guidance notes please...
Now you want the Unicode Consortium to provide user support for W3C protocols??!! This is utterly off topic. > 2.. What is the situation if a page is encoded entirely properly as far as, > say, using UTF-8 goes, yet also uses Private Use Area characters? So what? Do we also need a variation of the logo to indicate pages that use ideographic description sequences? variation selectors? Not necessary! > 4. Having recently been told quite strongly by several of the > non-Sarasvati-but-act-like-they-are-without-a-mandate people (I must admit i find that funny :-) Do I need a city ordinance and policeman to ask my neighbor to stop jack-hammering on into the night? - Peter --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peter Constable Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International 7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA Tel: +1 972 708 7485
