On 14/07/2003 11:10:35 Peter Kirk wrote:
>But one part of it might be rescued, if I understand rendering
>technologies correctly. Internally within a font only, Vladimir may
>define glyphs for his precomposed characters and assign PUA code points
>to them. In fact this seems to be how MS deals with some Hebrew
>presentation forms (ones which aren't in FB1D-FB4F) in Times New Roman.
>Then it can be part of the rendering technology Vladimir uses to
>substitute for the standard Unicode for his letter-accent combinations
>the PUA codes for the precomposed glyphs. For example, on a Microsoft
>system this may be included in an OpenType table, and Uniscribe (but
>only the soon to be released version which can process Cyrillic text)
>will perform the required glyph substitution.
None of the modern rendering technologies (OpenType, Graphite, AAT) require that PUA (or any other) code points be assigned to such precomposed glyphs.
Bob
- RE: Combining diacriticals and Cyrillic Jon Hanna
- Re: Combining diacriticals and Cyrillic Jungshik Shin
- Re: Combining diacriticals and Cyrilli... John Cowan
- Re: Combining diacriticals and Cy... Jungshik Shin
- Re: Combining diacriticals and Cyrillic Andrew C. West
- RE: Combining diacriticals and Cyrillic Rick Cameron
- RE: Combining diacriticals and Cyrillic Andrew C. West
- Re: Combining diacriticals and Cyrillic William Overington
- Re: Combining diacriticals and Cyrillic Tex Texin
- Re: Combining diacriticals and Cyrillic Peter Kirk
- Re: Combining diacriticals and Cyrillic Bob_Hallissy
- Re: Combining diacriticals and Cyrillic William Overington
- Re: Combining diacriticals and Cyrillic Peter Kirk
- Re: Combining diacriticals and Cyrillic Peter_Constable
- Re: Combining diacriticals and Cyrillic William Overington
- Re: Combining diacriticals and Cyrillic Philippe Verdy

