On Wednesday, July 30, 2003 4:44 PM, Peter Kirk wrote: > This depends on who you mean by "we". It's not just you and me, Ted. If > in discussions on this list a consensus is reached that this is the best > way to go, then we have the top people in Unicode behind us and > convinced in advance. Someone needs to draw up a formal proposal, I > suppose, but that's not a big job. SBL and SIL both have a stake here > and experienced people who can help, if they agree. If we can't convince > this list, then we are probably on a loser. But I already see several > people starting to agree that a new character is the best way to deal > with this issue.
By "we", I was referring to my company. If SBL, SIL, and others can be convinced to pursue this, I would laud it as a step in the right direction and would be happy to contribute what I can to the discussion. I just think that anyone submitting a formal proposal should be prepared to push it through the system. Ted Ted Hopp, Ph.D. ZigZag, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-301-990-7453 newSLATE is your personal learning workspace ...on the web at http://www.newSLATE.com/
