Thomas Widman suggested: > Peter Kirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On 08/08/2003 08:54, Philippe Verdy wrote: > > > > > ... Could there be another codepoint assigned that has > > >these properties: > > > > > >20CF;ZERO WIDTH SYMBOL;Sk;0;ON;<compat> 0020;;;;N;;;;; > > > [...] > > But I'm not sure that ZERO WIDTH SYMBOL is the best name, ... > > What would be a better name? ACCENT CARRIER?
How about: U+10FFFD UNNECESSARY CHARACTER ? Philippe, you are tilting at windmills, here. There is no chance that the UTC is going to consider such a character, in my assessment, let alone give it the properties you suggest. --Ken
