Kent Karlsson scripsit: > 4) Encode the vowel signs as combining characters, after > the base characters they logical follow. Consider them as > "double" [width] combining characters, that happen to > have no "ink" above/below the character they apply to, > but (like double width combining characters) have ink > over/under the glyph for the base character that follows.
Cool. But an immediate problem comes to mind: what if there is a line break between the two base characters? -- The man that wanders far [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the walking tree http://www.reutershealth.com --first line of a non-existent poem by: John Cowan
