I would like to point out that with all due respect, how particular fonts or rendering 
engines behave is only marginally relevant to the Unicode list. I think that we should 
deal only with the Unicode specification.

A particular implementation or many implementations may not behave as expected, and 
then may be either conformant or non-conformant, or may behave as expected and still 
be either conformant or non-conformant. Messages such as the attached help the 
discussion of the specification only as illustrations and as a basis for discussing 
conformity.

Jony

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Kirk
> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:11 PM
> To: Curtis Clark
> Cc: Unicode List
> Subject: Re: Display of Isolated Nonspacing Marks (was Re: 
> Questions on ZWNBS...)
> 
> 
> On 05/08/2003 16:59, Curtis Clark wrote:
> 
> > on 2003-08-05 15:31 Peter Kirk wrote:
> >
> >> Thank you, Mark. This helps to clarify things, but still doesn't
> >> explicitly answer my question of how to encode "a sentence 
> like "In 
> >> this language the diacritic ^ may appear above the letters 
> ...", but 
> >> instead of ^ I want to use a combining character"  and want to 
> >> display exactly one space before the combining character - do I 
> >> encode two spaces or one?
> >
> >
> > In this language the diacritic  ̊ may appear above the letters...
> >
> > Two spaces, at least in Thunderbird Mail.
> >
> >
> Thank you. Well, this sort of works. I looked in various 
> fonts. In some 
> of them the diacritic is centred in the space between the words 
> "diacritic" and "may", but in others it is offset to the left or the 
> right. The problem is that the space is wider than the 
> diacritic, which 
> confuses things, and all the more so no doubt if it expands for 
> justification. NBSP would probably be a better choice in that 
> it is less 
> likely to expand. But what I am looking for is a diacritic 
> holder which 
> is defined to be only as wide as the diacritic. On the principle that 
> base characters expand to fit the width of the diacritic,  ZWSP or, 
> better, a real (rather than misnamed) zero width no break space would 
> seem to have the right properties for that.
> 
> -- 
> Peter Kirk
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://web.onetel.net.uk/~peterkirk/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


Reply via email to