Peter Kirk scripsit: > Is it a principle of Unicode that a new script should not be encoded > because it is one to one correspondence with an existing one, even > though there is no graphical relationship? Well, that is certainly in > conflict with Michael's comments about Aramaic, Samaritan etc.
No. But it's a principle (an informal one) not to use resources encoding symbol repertoires that are just monalphabetic encryptions of existing language-specific repertoires. Which seems to me (I am willing to be corrected on this) to be what we have here. -- Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis vom dies! John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau, http://www.reutershealth.com Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan Und trank die Milch vom Paradies. -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)
