Re: Bangla: [ZWJ], [VIRAMA] and CV sequences

[Christopher John Fynn]

>  "Deepayan Sarkar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> But this would not reflect the fact that the *glyph* [CONS][ZWJ][CONS] is
> actually the same thing as the *sequence of characters*
[CONS][VIRAMA][CONS],
> i.e., [CONS][VIRAMA][ZWNJ][CONS] is also a perfectly legitimate
> representation.


As I understand it,   [CONS][VIRAMA][VIRAMA][CONS] is the correct way of
forcing a virama to be displayed rather than a ligature -  not
[CONS][VIRAMA][ZWNJ][CONS]

- Chris