Kent Karlsson scripsit: > All of CR, LF, <CR, LF>, NEL, LS, PS, and EOF(!). (Assuming that the > encoding of the text file is recognised.)
XML 1.0 treats CR, LF, and <CR, LF> as line terminators and reports them as LF. XML 1.1 will treat CR, LF, NEL, <CR, LF>, <CR, NEL>, and LS as line terminators and report them all as LF. PS is left alone, because of the bare possibility that it is being used as quasi-markup. I can't imagine why EOF should be called a line terminator, except in the sense that a "read a line" operation should obviously not attempt to read past EOF. Calling it a line terminator means that every document is forced into the mold of being an integral number of lines long, regardless of the facts. > Don't know about <LF, CR>. I think that should be two line ends. I agree. I don't know any system that uses this sequence. -- BALIN FUNDINUL UZBAD KHAZADDUMU [EMAIL PROTECTED] BALIN SON OF FUNDIN LORD OF KHAZAD-DUM http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
