|
In a message dated 11/5/2003 3:18:51 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: "Doug Ewell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I agree with all verdy said, except
" - negociation of allowed charsets and their encodings with clients;"
I don't think is will be impact by adding surrogate support or not.
-- Frank Yung-Fong Tang System Architect, I�t�rn�ti�n�l D�v�l�pme�t, AOL Int�r��t�v� S�rvi�es AIM:yungfongta mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel:650-937-2913 Yahoo! Msg: frankyungfongtan |
- Re: UTF-16 inside UTF-8 John Cowan
- Re: UTF-16 inside UTF-8 Frank Yung-Fong Tang
- Re: UTF-16 inside UTF-8 Doug Ewell
- Re: UTF-16 inside UTF-8 Frank Yung-Fong Tang
- RE: UTF-16 inside UTF-8 Philippe Verdy
- RE: UTF-16 inside UTF-8 Frank Yung-Fong Tang
- RE: UTF-16 inside UTF-8 Philippe Verdy
- RE: UTF-16 inside UTF-8 jon
- Re: UTF-16 inside UTF-8 Doug Ewell
- Re: UTF-16 inside UTF-8 YTang0648
- Re: UTF-16 inside UTF-8 YTang0648
- Re: UTF-16 inside UTF-8 Markus Scherer
- RE: UTF-16 inside UTF-8 D. Starner
- RE: UTF-16 inside UTF-8 jarkko.hietaniemi

