Philippe, I was deliberately making different threads for the main Unicode list and for the Hebrew list. Please keep them distinct.

On 08/11/2003 17:15, Philippe Verdy wrote:

I'm curious about what name you would give to it.
The name COMBINING CHARACTER JOINER is already used...


Where? It is not in the character index.

In all our discussions we should have used the term "starter" (instead of
just "base character" which is ambiguous) for any characters of combining
class 0 and which include: ...


Your new set of definitions just might be useful, but they are not the definitions in the Unicode standard and in some ways conflict with them. If you want different definitions, you may propose these to the UTC, but my question concerns what is acceptable according to the current definitions.

--
Peter Kirk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (personal)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work)
http://www.qaya.org/





Reply via email to