On 08/11/2003 17:15, Philippe Verdy wrote:
I'm curious about what name you would give to it.Where? It is not in the character index.
The name COMBINING CHARACTER JOINER is already used...
In all our discussions we should have used the term "starter" (instead ofYour new set of definitions just might be useful, but they are not the definitions in the Unicode standard and in some ways conflict with them. If you want different definitions, you may propose these to the UTC, but my question concerns what is acceptable according to the current definitions.
just "base character" which is ambiguous) for any characters of combining
class 0 and which include: ...
-- Peter Kirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] (personal) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) http://www.qaya.org/

