. Philippe Verdy wrote, > And in fact it's quite simple to do it with OpenType composite fonts that > can be built to refer to glyphs searched in another font: such a > "transliterator font" would not need any glyph, and thus does not require to > buy a licence for a commercial design ...
... which is probably just as well. Most people probably wouldn't pay much for a glyphless font anyway. Can you enlighten us with a link to the part of the OpenType specs which enables a glyphless OpenType font to access glyphs in a different font? Best regards, James Kass .
