----- Message d'origine ----- De: "Christopher John Fynn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "Patrick Andries" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Well, some fonts would be better than none > > (and they have to be made so that > > the Unicode standard be printed). > > In the case of complex scripts, a font sufficient to print a code chart is > nowhere near adequate to render that script properly. > > If you code chart type glyphs are enough for you then on Windows if you have MS > Office there is always Arial Unicode. Which, of course, is not complete hence my question (maybe a foolish one as someone seemed to say). P. A.
