Mark Davis <mark dot davis at jtcsv dot com> wrote: > Think you are missing a negative, see below. > >> Compression techniques may optionally replace certain sequences with >> canonically equivalent sequences to improve efficiency, but *only* if >> the output of the decompressed text is expected to be > is not required to be >> codepoint-for-codepoint equivalent to the original. Whether this is >> true or not depends on the user and the intended use of the text.
That's one of those fun side effects of going back and tinkering with a paragraph 99 times before hitting the Send button.. Of course Mark's text is what I meant to say. -Doug Ewell Fullerton, California http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
