Peter Kirk scripsit:

> >... (otherwise a normalizer
> >would be impossible; it wouldn't know whether to normalize or not!) ...
> >
> Not so. Normalisation is idempotent 

Quite right.  I should have said that normalization *checking* would be
impossible.

-- 
Only do what only you can do.           John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  --Edsger W. Dijkstra,                 http://www.reutershealth.com
    deceased 6 August 2002              http://www.ccil.org/~cowan

Reply via email to