>> One way to do that in Unicode would involve Canadian Syllabics: >> AáBA or even áááá. > > Can't it just be considered a glyph variant of "ABBA"?
Of course it is. I was being facetious, in the spirit of the thread. It is just as much a glyph variant as the "ya" in Toys 'Ð' Us. -Doug Ewell Fullerton, California http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
