Philippe wrote: > > For the same reason, why is the German "ess-tsett" (sharp S) given a > > compatibility decomposition as <s><s> instead of <long-s><s>?
I wrote a reply which I take back. Sharp s (Ã) does NOT have ANY
decomposition in the UCD. (It has a decomposition in the data file
used as a basis for the generation of the collation data tables (CTT
and DUCET), but that is another matter. It also has a case folding,
but that too is another matter.)
/kent k
