Re: Klingon

Thu, 15 Jan 2004 08:37:07 -0800

WHY THEN DISTRIBUTES THE KLI SUCH A BLATANTLY UNCONFORMANT FONT?
 
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Everson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 1:15 PM
Subject: Re: Klingon

> At 11:15 +0100 2004-01-15, Chris Jacobs wrote:
>
> >  > I had a problem with this too, for a while (previous discussion on this
> >>  list helped clear it up).  Klingon letters had been placed in the PUA by
> >>  the CSUR (ConsScript Unicode Registry, an unofficial allocation of PUA
> >>  space to constructed alphabets),
> >
> >Really?
> >
> >And did the Klingon Language Institute endorse that?
>
> Yes. See http://www.evertype.com/standards/csur/klingon.html
> The original encoding was made for some Linux implementation in 1995
> or 1996 I suppose.
> --
> Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com
>
>

Reply via email to